← All factors / TF RECORD
YLL054C
No recorded aliases
Function unknown
01 / RECOMMENDED MATRIX
Best-performing DNA-binding model.
Fisher’s P-valueNo data
Information content12.83
Max PWM score14.53
Recommended cutoff10.89
View and copy the recommended matrices ↘
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.20 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.01 0.02 0.04 0.75 C | 0.12 0.91 0.81 0.04 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.93 0.16 0.02 0.11 G | 0.11 0.02 0.16 0.93 0.19 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.04 0.81 0.91 0.12 T | 0.75 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.35 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.02
Position count matrix (PCM)
A | 2 3 1 2 20 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 1 2 4 75 C | 12 91 81 4 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 93 16 2 11 G | 11 2 16 93 19 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 4 81 91 12 T | 75 4 2 1 35 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 2 1 3 2
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -2.77 -2.37 -3.47 -2.77 -0.47 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -3.47 -2.77 -2.08 0.85 C | -0.41 1.62 1.50 -1.50 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.64 -0.12 -2.20 -0.49 G | -0.49 -2.20 -0.12 1.64 0.05 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 -1.50 1.50 1.62 -0.41 T | 0.85 -2.08 -2.77 -3.47 0.09 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -2.77 -3.47 -2.37 -2.77
02 / COMPARATIVE BENCHMARKS
Alternative candidate matrices 2
Historical matrix candidates from the original ScerTF database. Expand a source to inspect its original logo, scores, and matrix values.
YLL054CBadis et. al.P = No dataView matrix ↘
Fisher’s P-valueNo data
Information content9.913
Max PWM score9.65
Recommended cutoff7.24
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.21 0.09 0.13 0.58 C | 0.97 0.01 0.01 0.64 0.66 0.05 0.14 G | 0.01 0.97 0.97 0.14 0.16 0.77 0.07 T | 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.05 0.21
Position count matrix (PCM)
A | 1 1 1 21 9 13 57 C | 97 1 1 64 66 5 14 G | 1 97 97 14 16 77 7 T | 1 1 1 1 9 5 21
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -0.42 -1.27 -0.90 0.59 C | 1.68 -2.89 -2.89 1.27 1.30 -1.28 -0.25 G | -2.89 1.68 1.68 -0.25 -0.12 1.45 -0.94 T | -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -1.27 -1.86 -0.42
YLL054CZhao and StormoP = No dataView matrix ↘
Fisher’s P-valueNo data
Information content6.63
Max PWM score6.88
Recommended cutoff5.16
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.266 0.326 0.003 0.001 0.023 0.391 0.277 0.308 C | 0.253 0.137 0.972 0.109 0.060 0.202 0.220 0.219 G | 0.233 0.273 0.024 0.889 0.916 0.330 0.203 0.267 T | 0.248 0.264 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.076 0.300 0.206
Position count matrix (PCM)
A | 26 32 0 0 2 39 27 30 C | 25 13 97 10 6 20 22 21 G | 23 27 2 88 91 33 20 26 T | 24 26 0 0 0 7 30 20
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -0.18 0.02 -4.67 -5.77 -2.63 0.20 -0.14 -0.04 C | 0.34 -0.27 1.69 -0.50 -1.10 0.12 0.20 0.20 G | 0.26 0.42 -2.01 1.60 1.63 0.61 0.12 0.39 T | -0.25 -0.19 -5.77 -5.77 -5.77 -1.44 -0.06 -0.44
03 / EXPERIMENTAL CONTEXT
Gene-level annotations and interactions.
Genes bound in ChIP-chip experiments 1 genes
No Data
Genes affected by TF deletion 1 genes
No Data
Genes supported by both experiments 1 genes
No Data