← All factors / TF RECORD
TEA1
YOR337W
Ty1 enhancer activator required for full levels of Ty enhancer-mediated transcription; C6 zinc cluster DNA-binding protein
01 / RECOMMENDED MATRIX
Best-performing DNA-binding model.
Fisher’s P-valueNo data
Information content19.53
Max PWM score19.18
Recommended cutoff14.39
View and copy the recommended matrices ↘
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.23 0.16 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.50 0.93 0.65 0.02 0.02 0.97 0.96 0.42 0.32 0.79 0.18 0.01 C | 0.14 0.42 0.01 0.13 0.97 0.01 0.03 0.08 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.13 0.09 0.39 0.97 G | 0.04 0.23 0.02 0.53 0.01 0.97 0.95 0.27 0.03 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.12 0.03 0.17 0.01 T | 0.59 0.19 0.92 0.32 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.15 0.02 0.28 0.97 0.96 0.01 0.02 0.37 0.43 0.09 0.26 0.01
Position count matrix (PCM)
A | 23 16 5 2 1 1 1 50 93 65 2 2 97 96 42 32 79 18 1 C | 14 42 1 13 97 1 3 8 3 3 1 1 1 1 12 13 9 39 97 G | 4 23 2 53 1 97 95 27 3 4 1 1 1 1 8 12 3 17 1 T | 59 19 92 32 1 1 1 15 2 28 97 96 1 2 37 43 9 26 1
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -0.33 -0.69 -1.86 -2.77 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 0.45 1.07 0.71 -2.77 -2.77 1.11 1.10 0.27 0.00 0.90 -0.58 -3.47 C | -0.25 0.85 -2.89 -0.33 1.68 -2.89 -1.79 -0.81 -1.79 -1.79 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89 -0.41 -0.33 -0.69 0.77 1.68 G | -1.50 0.25 -2.20 1.08 -2.89 1.68 1.66 0.41 -1.79 -1.50 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89 -0.81 -0.41 -1.79 -0.06 -2.89 T | 0.61 -0.52 1.06 0.00 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -0.76 -2.77 -0.13 1.11 1.10 -3.47 -2.77 0.15 0.30 -1.27 -0.21 -3.47
02 / COMPARATIVE BENCHMARKS
Alternative candidate matrices 2
Historical matrix candidates from the original ScerTF database. Expand a source to inspect its original logo, scores, and matrix values.
TEA1Badis et. al.P = No dataView matrix ↘
Fisher’s P-valueNo data
Information content10.11
Max PWM score9.69
Recommended cutoff7.27
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.49 0.01 0.59 0.15 C | 0.05 0.97 0.01 0.39 0.01 0.78 0.01 0.20 G | 0.75 0.01 0.97 0.59 0.49 0.20 0.10 0.05 T | 0.15 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.30 0.60
Position count matrix (PCM)
A | 5 1 1 1 49 1 59 15 C | 5 97 1 39 1 78 1 20 G | 75 1 97 59 49 20 10 5 T | 15 1 1 1 1 1 30 60
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -1.86 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 0.43 -3.47 0.61 -0.76 C | -1.28 1.68 -2.89 0.77 -2.89 1.47 -2.89 0.11 G | 1.43 -2.89 1.68 1.19 1.00 0.11 -0.59 -1.28 T | -0.76 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -0.06 0.63
TEA1Zhao and StormoP = No dataView matrix ↘
Fisher’s P-valueNo data
Information content6.371
Max PWM score7.06
Recommended cutoff5.29
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.581 0.334 0.188 0.224 0.077 0.006 0.001 0.284 C | 0.033 0.171 0.286 0.226 0.625 0.992 0.064 0.464 G | 0.113 0.112 0.286 0.124 0.273 0.001 0.930 0.129 T | 0.274 0.384 0.241 0.425 0.025 0.001 0.005 0.123
Position count matrix (PCM)
A | 58 33 18 22 7 0 0 28 C | 3 17 28 22 62 99 6 46 G | 11 11 28 12 27 0 93 12 T | 27 38 24 42 2 0 0 12
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | 0.60 0.04 -0.53 -0.36 -1.42 -3.98 -5.77 -0.12 C | -1.70 -0.05 0.46 0.23 1.24 1.71 -1.03 0.95 G | -0.47 -0.47 0.46 -0.37 0.42 -5.19 1.64 -0.33 T | -0.16 0.18 -0.28 0.28 -2.55 -5.77 -4.16 -0.96
03 / EXPERIMENTAL CONTEXT
Gene-level annotations and interactions.
Genes bound in ChIP-chip experiments 1 genes
No Data
Genes affected by TF deletion 1 genes
No Data
Genes supported by both experiments 1 genes
No Data