SUT2

YPR009W

Putative transcription factor; multicopy suppressor of mutations that cause low activity of the cAMP/protein kinase A pathway; highly similar to Sut1p

01 / RECOMMENDED MATRIX

Best-performing DNA-binding model.

RecommendedSource: Zhu et. al.

Fisher’s P-value0.01688

Information content13.5

Max PWM score11.56

Recommended cutoff10.48

View and copy the recommended matrices ↘

Position frequency matrix (PFM)

A | 0.52 0.94 0.96 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.79 0.52 
C | 0.09 0.01 0.01 0.70 0.02 0.97 0.97 0.01 0.02 0.08 
G | 0.29 0.01 0.01 0.28 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.97 0.17 0.26 
T | 0.10 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.96 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.14

Position count matrix (PCM)

A |  52  94  96   1   1   1   1   1  79  52 
C |   9   1   1  70   2  97  97   1   2   8 
G |  28   1   1  28   1   1   1  97  17  26 
T |  10   4   2   1  96   1   1   1   2  14

Position weight matrix (PWM)

A |  0.49  1.08  1.10 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47  0.90  0.49 
C | -0.69 -2.89 -2.89  1.36 -2.20  1.68  1.68 -2.89 -2.20 -0.81 
G |  0.48 -2.89 -2.89  0.44 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89  1.68 -0.06  0.37 
T | -1.16 -2.08 -2.77 -3.47  1.10 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -2.77 -0.83

02 / COMPARATIVE BENCHMARKS

Alternative candidate matrices 2

Historical matrix candidates from the original ScerTF database. Expand a source to inspect its original logo, scores, and matrix values.

SUT2Foat et. al.P = 1View matrix ↘

Fisher’s P-value1

Information content18.77

Max PWM score16.76

Recommended cutoff12.57

Position frequency matrix (PFM)

A | 0.09 0.08 0.01 0.97 0.01 0.37 0.28 0.01 0.01 0.91 0.01 0.01 0.47 
C | 0.12 0.02 0.83 0.01 0.97 0.01 0.53 0.93 0.97 0.01 0.56 0.97 0.01 
G | 0.78 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.18 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.43 0.01 0.51 
T | 0.01 0.89 0.15 0.01 0.01 0.61 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.01

Position count matrix (PCM)

A |   9   8   1  97   1  37  28   1   1  91   1   1  47 
C |  12   2  83   1  97   1  53  93  97   1  56  97   1 
G |  78   1   1   1   1   1  18   5   1   1  43   1  51 
T |   1  89  15   1   1  61   1   1   1   7   1   1   1

Position weight matrix (PWM)

A | -1.27 -1.39 -3.47  1.11 -3.47  0.15 -0.13 -3.47 -3.47  1.05 -3.47 -3.47  0.38 
C | -0.41 -2.20  1.53 -2.89  1.68 -2.89  1.08  1.64  1.68 -2.89  1.13  1.68 -2.89 
G |  1.47 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89  0.00 -1.28 -2.89 -2.89  0.87 -2.89  1.04 
T | -3.47  1.02 -0.76 -3.47 -3.47  0.65 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -1.52 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47

Foat et. al.

SUT2Zhao and StormoP = 0.06105View matrix ↘

Fisher’s P-value0.06105

Information content8.9

Max PWM score7.78

Recommended cutoff6.56

Position frequency matrix (PFM)

A | 0.008 0.001 0.024 0.832 0.074 0.179 
C | 0.970 0.014 0.001 0.001 0.350 0.161 
G | 0.003 0.984 0.961 0.109 0.549 0.053 
T | 0.019 0.001 0.014 0.058 0.027 0.607

Position count matrix (PCM)

A |   0   0   2  83   7  17 
C |  97   1   0   0  35  16 
G |   0  98  96  10  54   5 
T |   1   0   1   5   2  60

Position weight matrix (PWM)

A | -3.69 -5.77 -2.59  0.96 -1.46 -0.58 
C |  1.68 -2.55 -5.19 -5.19  0.66 -0.11 
G | -4.09  1.70  1.68 -0.50  1.12 -1.22 
T | -2.82 -5.77 -3.13 -1.71 -2.47  0.64

Zhao and Stormo

03 / EXPERIMENTAL CONTEXT

Gene-level annotations and interactions.

Genes bound in ChIP-chip experiments 8 genes

YAR050W, YDL206W, YDR424C, YDR425W, YKR054C, YKR055W, YMR225C, YNL214W

Genes affected by TF deletion 62 genes

YHR146W, YOR065W, YNR060W, YDL037C, YJR112W, YOR317W, YML027W, YMR314W, YFR006W, YNL180C, YBL058W, YLR183C, YNL300W, YIL124W, YML121W, YAL044C, YOR043W, YOR264W, YFR041C, YKL085W, YLR099C, YLR069C, YOR074C, YGR220C, YHR215W, YNR035C, YPL118W, YPL092W, YGR012W, YOR354C, YBR264C, YER064C, YGR253C, YMR263W, YNL310C, YKR093W, YNL065W, YKL096W, YNL289W, YPL031C, YPL066W, YLR294C, YNL098C, YNL100W, YGR139W, YNL290W, YPL004C, YOR367W, YPL163C, YBR026C, YLR297W, YGL255W, YMR034C, YOL038W, YHR137W, YLR079W, YLR049C, YDL029W, YBR149W, YOL101C, YPR009W, YNL007C

Predicted TF–TF partners 4 genes

GSM1, MIG3, STB4, YER184C

Explore 4 original interaction plots →