← All factors / TF RECORD
SNT2
YGL131C
DNA binding protein with similarity to the S. pombe Snt2 protein; computational analysis suggests a role in regulation of expression of genes encoding amine transporters
01 / RECOMMENDED MATRIX
Best-performing DNA-binding model.
Fisher’s P-value1.02e-34
Information content19.91
Max PWM score16.8
Recommended cutoff14.4
View and copy the recommended matrices ↘
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.446 0.162 0.036 0.570 0.001 0.997 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.326 0.208 0.333 0.185 C | 0.099 0.088 0.001 0.081 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.997 0.001 0.997 0.997 0.011 0.349 0.190 0.360 G | 0.099 0.088 0.962 0.313 0.001 0.001 0.997 0.001 0.997 0.001 0.001 0.627 0.088 0.167 0.099 T | 0.356 0.662 0.001 0.036 0.997 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.036 0.356 0.310 0.356
Position count matrix (PCM)
A | 44 16 3 56 0 99 0 0 0 0 0 32 20 33 18 C | 9 8 0 8 0 0 0 99 0 99 99 1 34 19 36 G | 9 8 96 31 0 0 99 0 99 0 0 62 8 16 9 T | 35 66 0 3 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 35 31 35
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | 0.33 -0.68 -2.18 0.58 -5.77 1.14 -5.77 -5.77 -5.77 -5.77 -5.77 0.02 -0.43 0.04 -0.55 C | -0.60 -0.72 -5.19 -0.80 -5.19 -5.19 -5.19 1.71 -5.19 1.71 1.71 -2.80 0.66 0.05 0.69 G | -0.60 -0.72 1.68 0.55 -5.19 -5.19 1.71 -5.19 1.71 -5.19 -5.19 1.25 -0.72 -0.07 -0.60 T | 0.11 0.73 -5.77 -2.18 1.14 -5.77 -5.77 -5.77 -5.77 -5.77 -5.77 -2.18 0.11 -0.03 0.11
02 / COMPARATIVE BENCHMARKS
Alternative candidate matrices 3
Historical matrix candidates from the original ScerTF database. Expand a source to inspect its original logo, scores, and matrix values.
SNT2Foat et. al.P = 1View matrix ↘
Fisher’s P-value1
Information content19.99
Max PWM score20.93
Recommended cutoff15.7
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.11 0.52 0.11 0.14 0.01 0.01 0.23 0.30 0.37 0.58 0.35 0.04 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.17 0.50 0.36 C | 0.31 0.02 0.36 0.03 0.08 0.01 0.01 0.68 0.13 0.01 0.39 0.13 0.77 0.37 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.79 0.05 0.44 G | 0.01 0.42 0.40 0.82 0.90 0.39 0.74 0.01 0.30 0.30 0.26 0.37 0.06 0.20 0.97 0.97 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.19 T | 0.58 0.04 0.12 0.01 0.01 0.60 0.02 0.01 0.20 0.12 0.01 0.46 0.12 0.41 0.01 0.01 0.97 0.01 0.43 0.01
Position count matrix (PCM)
A | 11 52 11 14 1 1 23 30 37 57 35 4 5 2 1 1 1 17 50 36 C | 31 2 36 3 8 1 1 68 13 1 39 13 77 37 1 1 1 79 5 44 G | 1 42 40 82 90 39 74 1 30 30 26 37 6 20 97 97 1 3 1 19 T | 57 4 12 1 1 60 2 1 20 12 1 46 12 41 1 1 97 1 43 1
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -1.07 0.49 -1.07 -0.83 -3.47 -3.47 -0.33 -0.06 0.15 0.59 0.09 -2.08 -1.86 -2.77 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -0.63 0.45 0.12 C | 0.54 -2.20 0.69 -1.79 -0.81 -2.89 -2.89 1.33 -0.33 -2.89 0.77 -0.33 1.45 0.72 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89 1.48 -1.28 0.89 G | -2.89 0.85 0.80 1.52 1.61 0.77 1.41 -2.89 0.51 0.51 0.37 0.72 -1.10 0.11 1.68 1.68 -2.89 -1.79 -2.89 0.05 T | 0.59 -2.08 -0.98 -3.47 -3.47 0.63 -2.77 -3.47 -0.47 -0.98 -3.47 0.36 -0.98 0.25 -3.47 -3.47 1.11 -3.47 0.30 -3.47
SNT2Harbison et. al.P = 2.81e-33View matrix ↘
Fisher’s P-value2.81e-33
Information content13.2
Max PWM score13.73
Recommended cutoff12.39
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.131 0.078 0.046 0.014 0.033 0.022 0.017 0.928 0.081 0.109 0.632 C | 0.415 0.027 0.010 0.960 0.009 0.924 0.042 0.017 0.377 0.704 0.087 G | 0.059 0.824 0.853 0.013 0.917 0.025 0.045 0.017 0.099 0.070 0.111 T | 0.395 0.071 0.091 0.013 0.041 0.029 0.896 0.038 0.443 0.118 0.170
Position count matrix (PCM)
A | 13 7 4 1 3 2 1 92 8 10 63 C | 41 2 1 96 0 92 4 1 37 70 8 G | 5 82 85 1 91 2 4 1 9 7 11 T | 39 7 9 1 4 2 89 3 44 11 17
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -0.89 -1.41 -1.94 -3.13 -2.27 -2.68 -2.94 1.06 -1.37 -1.08 0.68 C | 0.84 -1.90 -2.89 1.67 -3.00 1.64 -1.46 -2.36 0.74 1.36 -0.73 G | -1.12 1.52 1.56 -2.63 1.63 -1.97 -1.39 -2.36 -0.60 -0.94 -0.48 T | 0.21 -1.51 -1.26 -3.20 -2.05 -2.40 1.03 -2.13 0.33 -1.00 -0.63
SNT2Pachkov et alP = 3.91e-32View matrix ↘
Fisher’s P-value3.91e-32
Information content19.64
Max PWM score15.5
Recommended cutoff13.58
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.001 0.001 0.414 0.001 0.989 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.003 0.054 0.275 C | 0.028 0.001 0.079 0.001 0.001 0.001 1.000 0.001 0.974 0.946 0.068 G | 0.097 1.000 0.507 0.001 0.011 0.998 0.001 1.000 0.024 0.001 0.486 T | 0.875 0.001 0.001 1.000 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.172
Position count matrix (PCM)
A | 0 0 41 0 98 0 0 0 0 5 27 C | 2 0 7 0 0 0 100 0 97 94 6 G | 9 100 50 0 1 99 0 100 2 0 48 T | 87 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -5.77 -5.77 0.26 -5.77 1.13 -5.08 -5.77 -5.77 -4.67 -1.78 -0.15 C | -1.86 -5.19 -0.82 -5.19 -5.19 -5.19 1.71 -5.19 1.69 1.66 -0.97 G | -0.62 1.71 1.04 -5.19 -2.80 1.71 -5.19 1.71 -2.01 -5.19 0.99 T | 1.01 -5.77 -5.77 1.14 -5.77 -5.77 -5.77 -5.77 -5.77 -5.77 -0.62
03 / EXPERIMENTAL CONTEXT
Gene-level annotations and interactions.
Genes bound in ChIP-chip experiments 71 genes
YAL038W, YAL039C, YAL053W, YAL054C, YAR050W, YBL073W, YBL074C, YBL075C, YBL095W, YBR138C, YBR139W, YBR143C, YCR090C, YCR091W, YDR008C, YDR009W, YDR046C, YDR047W, YDR261W-A, YDR261W-B, YDR366C, YDR368W, YDR543C, YER189W, YER190W, YGR110W, YHR009C, YHR010W, YHR138C, YHR160C, YHR175W, YHR214C-B, YHR214C-C, YHR215W, YHR216W, YHR218W, YHR219W, YIL102C, YIL155C, YIL159W, YIL160C, YJL092W, YJL093C, YJL148W, YJL184W, YJL185C, YJR130C, YJR131W, YJR153W, YKL171W, YLL004W, YLL005C, YLR149C, YLR150W, YLR176C, YLR177W, YLR228C, YLR230W, YLR373C, YLR375W, YMR045C, YMR046C, YMR052W, YNL181W, YNL182C, YNL337W, YOL116W, YOR236W, YPR104C, YPR158W, YPR184W
Genes affected by TF deletion 1 genes
No Data