← All factors / TF RECORD
RDS1
YCR106W
Zinc cluster transcription factor involved in conferring resistance to cycloheximide
01 / RECOMMENDED MATRIX
Best-performing DNA-binding model.
Fisher’s P-value2.27e-13
Information content14.69
Max PWM score11.82
Recommended cutoff10.9
View and copy the recommended matrices ↘
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.80 C | 0.01 0.97 0.05 0.02 0.96 0.93 0.01 0.18 G | 0.18 0.01 0.93 0.96 0.02 0.05 0.97 0.01 T | 0.80 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Position count matrix (PCM)
A | 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 80 C | 1 97 5 2 96 93 1 18 G | 18 1 93 96 2 5 97 1 T | 80 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 0.92 C | -2.89 1.68 -1.28 -2.20 1.67 1.64 -2.89 0.00 G | 0.00 -2.89 1.64 1.67 -2.20 -1.28 1.68 -2.89 T | 0.92 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47
02 / COMPARATIVE BENCHMARKS
Alternative candidate matrices 8
Historical matrix candidates from the original ScerTF database. Expand a source to inspect its original logo, scores, and matrix values.
RDS1Badis et. al.P = 3.33e-10View matrix ↘
Fisher’s P-value3.33e-10
Information content11.37
Max PWM score9.62
Recommended cutoff9.62
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 C | 0.91 0.11 0.01 0.82 0.93 0.11 G | 0.01 0.87 0.97 0.16 0.05 0.87 T | 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Position count matrix (PCM)
A | 1 1 1 1 1 1 C | 91 11 1 82 93 11 G | 1 87 97 16 5 87 T | 7 1 1 1 1 1
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 C | 1.62 -0.49 -2.89 1.52 1.64 -0.49 G | -2.89 1.58 1.68 -0.12 -1.28 1.58 T | -1.52 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47
RDS1_AFoat et. al.P = 4.37e-11View matrix ↘
Fisher’s P-value4.37e-11
Information content15.96
Max PWM score14.16
Recommended cutoff9.8
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.09 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.58 0.28 C | 0.57 0.01 0.95 0.01 0.14 0.96 0.97 0.01 0.01 0.51 G | 0.33 0.87 0.03 0.86 0.85 0.01 0.01 0.97 0.01 0.17 T | 0.01 0.11 0.01 0.13 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.41 0.04
Position count matrix (PCM)
A | 9 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 57 28 C | 56 1 95 1 14 96 97 1 1 51 G | 33 87 3 86 85 1 1 97 1 17 T | 1 11 1 13 1 1 1 1 41 4
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -1.27 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -2.77 -2.77 -3.47 0.59 -0.13 C | 1.15 -2.89 1.66 -2.89 -0.25 1.67 1.68 -2.89 -2.89 1.04 G | 0.61 1.58 -1.79 1.56 1.55 -2.89 -2.89 1.68 -2.89 -0.06 T | -3.47 -1.07 -3.47 -0.90 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 0.25 -2.08
RDS1_BFoat et. al.P = 1View matrix ↘
Fisher’s P-value1
Information content12.83
Max PWM score14.31
Recommended cutoff10.73
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.41 0.16 0.01 0.09 0.83 0.07 0.13 0.96 0.01 0.20 0.03 0.07 0.06 C | 0.01 0.42 0.41 0.88 0.13 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.40 0.84 0.48 G | 0.39 0.01 0.32 0.01 0.01 0.75 0.65 0.01 0.24 0.70 0.01 0.01 0.44 T | 0.20 0.41 0.27 0.02 0.03 0.16 0.17 0.02 0.74 0.01 0.57 0.08 0.02
Position count matrix (PCM)
A | 41 16 1 9 83 7 13 96 1 20 3 7 6 C | 1 42 41 88 13 1 4 1 1 10 40 84 48 G | 39 1 32 1 1 75 65 1 24 70 1 1 44 T | 20 41 27 2 3 16 17 2 74 1 56 8 2
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | 0.25 -0.69 -3.47 -1.27 0.95 -1.52 -0.90 1.10 -3.47 -0.47 -2.37 -1.52 -1.67 C | -2.89 0.85 0.82 1.59 -0.33 -2.89 -1.50 -2.89 -2.89 -0.59 0.80 1.54 0.98 G | 0.77 -2.89 0.58 -2.89 -2.89 1.43 1.28 -2.89 0.29 1.36 -2.89 -2.89 0.89 T | -0.47 0.25 -0.17 -2.77 -2.37 -0.69 -0.63 -2.77 0.84 -3.47 0.58 -1.39 -2.77
RDS1Harbison et. al.P = 2.27e-13View matrix ↘
Fisher’s P-value2.27e-13
Information content13.07
Max PWM score11.32
Recommended cutoff10.75
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.095 0.013 0.035 0.034 0.013 0.012 0.011 0.660 C | 0.075 0.966 0.005 0.043 0.915 0.944 0.006 0.188 G | 0.201 0.011 0.950 0.895 0.046 0.005 0.971 0.069 T | 0.629 0.010 0.009 0.027 0.026 0.039 0.012 0.083
Position count matrix (PCM)
A | 9 1 3 3 1 1 1 66 C | 7 96 0 4 91 94 0 18 G | 20 1 95 89 4 0 97 6 T | 62 1 0 2 2 3 1 8
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -1.21 -3.20 -2.21 -2.24 -3.20 -3.28 -3.37 0.72 C | -0.88 1.68 -3.58 -1.43 1.63 1.66 -3.40 0.04 G | 0.11 -2.80 1.66 1.60 -1.36 -3.58 1.69 -0.96 T | 0.68 -3.47 -3.57 -2.47 -2.51 -2.10 -3.28 -1.35
RDS1Macisaac et. alP = 3.33e-10View matrix ↘
Fisher’s P-value3.33e-10
Information content14.63
Max PWM score10.26
Recommended cutoff10.26
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 C | 0.997 0.001 0.001 0.997 0.997 0.001 G | 0.001 0.997 0.997 0.001 0.001 0.997 T | 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
Position count matrix (PCM)
A | 0 0 0 0 0 0 C | 99 0 0 99 99 0 G | 0 99 99 0 0 99 T | 0 0 0 0 0 0
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -5.77 -5.77 -5.77 -5.77 -5.77 -5.77 C | 1.71 -5.19 -5.19 1.71 1.71 -5.19 G | -5.19 1.71 1.71 -5.19 -5.19 1.71 T | -5.77 -5.77 -5.77 -5.77 -5.77 -5.77
RDS1Morozov et. al.P = 1.49e-12View matrix ↘
Fisher’s P-value1.49e-12
Information content10.27
Max PWM score10.21
Recommended cutoff10.21
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.028 0.040 0.036 0.080 0.120 0.028 0.801 C | 0.925 0.038 0.051 0.770 0.719 0.015 0.009 G | 0.032 0.864 0.888 0.081 0.037 0.935 0.044 T | 0.015 0.058 0.024 0.069 0.125 0.023 0.146
Position count matrix (PCM)
A | 2 4 3 8 12 2 80 C | 92 3 5 77 71 1 0 G | 3 86 88 8 3 93 4 T | 1 5 2 6 12 2 14
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -2.44 -2.08 -2.18 -1.39 -0.98 -2.44 0.92 C | 1.64 -1.56 -1.26 1.45 1.38 -2.48 -3.00 G | -1.73 1.57 1.60 -0.80 -1.58 1.65 -1.41 T | -3.06 -1.71 -2.59 -1.53 -0.94 -2.63 -0.78
RDS1Pachkov et alP = 8.25e-14View matrix ↘
Fisher’s P-value8.25e-14
Information content14.21
Max PWM score11.55
Recommended cutoff10.43
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.054 0.644 0.253 C | 0.955 0.001 0.021 1.000 0.820 0.001 0.256 0.438 G | 0.001 1.000 0.979 0.001 0.180 0.946 0.013 0.225 T | 0.045 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.087 0.084
Position count matrix (PCM)
A | 0 0 0 0 0 5 64 25 C | 95 0 2 100 82 0 25 43 G | 0 100 97 0 18 94 1 22 T | 4 0 0 0 0 0 8 8
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -5.77 -5.77 -5.77 -5.77 -5.77 -1.78 0.70 -0.23 C | 1.67 -5.19 -2.15 1.71 1.52 -5.19 0.35 0.89 G | -5.19 1.71 1.69 -5.19 0.00 1.66 -2.63 0.22 T | -1.96 -5.77 -5.77 -5.77 -5.77 -5.77 -1.30 -1.34
RDS1Zhao and StormoP = 0.000659View matrix ↘
Fisher’s P-value0.000659
Information content7.096
Max PWM score6.59
Recommended cutoff4.9
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.094 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.300 C | 0.075 0.861 0.001 0.085 0.294 G | 0.575 0.001 0.997 0.913 0.306 T | 0.256 0.137 0.001 0.001 0.100
Position count matrix (PCM)
A | 9 0 0 0 30 C | 7 86 0 8 29 G | 57 0 99 91 30 T | 25 13 0 0 10
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -1.23 -5.77 -5.77 -5.77 -0.06 C | -0.88 1.57 -5.19 -0.75 0.49 G | 1.16 -5.19 1.71 1.62 0.53 T | -0.22 -0.85 -5.77 -5.77 -1.16
03 / EXPERIMENTAL CONTEXT
Gene-level annotations and interactions.
Genes bound in ChIP-chip experiments 31 genes
YCL055W, YCL056C, YCR105W, YCR106W, YCR107W, YDR144C, YDR145W, YER138C, YGL157W, YGR004W, YGR175C, YGR176W, YGR225W, YKL118W, YKL177W, YKL179C, YLR083C, YLR433C, YLR434C, YMR103C, YMR125W, YMR126C, YMR257C, YMR259C, YNL188W, YNL258C, YPL070W, YPL071C, YPL073C, YPR158W-A, YPR158W-B
Genes affected by TF deletion 111 genes
YOL047C, YDR216W, YDR190C, YDR222W, YGL045W, YGR152C, YHR180W, YJL051W, YKL049C, YMR220W, YNL271C, YBL083C, YBR029C, YBL085W, YBR001C, YCR041W, YCR015C, YCR043C, YDR003W, YDR005C, YDR065W, YDR369C, YDR401W, YDR433W, YDR371W, YDR403W, YDR435C, YER111C, YGL229C, YGL170C, YGL202W, YHL045W, YGR281W, YHL015W, YIL077C, YIL141W, YIL111W, YJR049C, YJR084W, YJR021C, YKR013W, YML113W, YOR254C, YDL127W, YFR033C, YPL014W, YCR106W, YMR103C, YGR250C, YML027W, YCR107W, YJL017W, YMR104C, YMR136W, YNL116W, YDR279W, YPR191W, YER042W, YCR021C, YDR074W, YOR267C, YPL247C, YDL076C, YKL051W, YER150W, YMR023C, YMR199W, YOR074C, YOR384W, YFR017C, YKL026C, YMR078C, YMR145C, YNL309W, YIR035C, YJR119C, YOR324C, YBR264C, YER064C, YPL087W, YGL183C, YGR292W, YOR273C, YGR138C, YNL289W, YNL035C, YAR018C, YGR139W, YDL048C, YDR177W, YNL159C, YNL160W, YGL154C, YBR054W, YER139C, YGL223C, YLR297W, YDL150W, YPR106W, YDR055W, YIL103W, YMR034C, YMR181C, YMR250W, YOR092W, YCL040W, YDR155C, YDR523C, YOL101C, YOL165C, YNR019W
Genes supported by both experiments 3 genes
YCR106W, YCR107W, YMR103C
Predicted TF–TF partners 6 genes
HAP2, HAP4, OAF1, PHD1, STB1, SWI4