S.ScerTFYeast transcription factor database Aaron Spivak
← All factors / TF RECORD

NRG2

YBR066C

View at SGD ↗

Transcriptional repressor that mediates glucose repression and negatively regulates filamentous growth; has similarity to Nrg1p

01 / RECOMMENDED MATRIX

Best-performing DNA-binding model.

RecommendedSource: Fordyce et. al.
Fisher’s P-valueNo data
Information content9.928
Max PWM score9.72
Recommended cutoff7.3
View and copy the recommended matrices ↘
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.01 0.01 0.20 0.05 0.01 0.39 0.81 0.01 
C | 0.01 0.01 0.06 0.70 0.47 0.37 0.03 0.01 
G | 0.97 0.97 0.08 0.01 0.27 0.07 0.15 0.97 
T | 0.01 0.01 0.66 0.24 0.26 0.17 0.01 0.01
Position count matrix (PCM)
A |   1   1  20   5   1  39  81   1 
C |   1   1   6  70  47  37   3   1 
G |  97  97   8   1  27   7  15  97 
T |   1   1  66  24  26  17   1   1
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -3.47 -3.47 -0.47 -1.86 -3.47  0.20  0.93 -3.47 
C | -2.89 -2.89 -1.10  1.36  0.96  0.72 -1.79 -2.89 
G |  1.68  1.68 -0.81 -2.89  0.41 -0.94 -0.18  1.68 
T | -3.47 -3.47  0.72 -0.29 -0.21 -0.63 -3.47 -3.47
02 / COMPARATIVE BENCHMARKS

Alternative candidate matrices 2

Historical matrix candidates from the original ScerTF database. Expand a source to inspect its original logo, scores, and matrix values.

NRG2_BFordyce et. al.P = No dataView matrix ↘
Fisher’s P-valueNo data
Information content9.551
Max PWM score9.39
Recommended cutoff7.04
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.38 0.81 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.20 0.14 0.01 
C | 0.37 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.62 0.38 
G | 0.05 0.15 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.08 0.01 0.34 
T | 0.19 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.65 0.24 0.27
Position count matrix (PCM)
A |  38  81   1   1   1  20  14   1 
C |  37   3   1   1   1   7  62  38 
G |   5  15  97  97  97   8   1  34 
T |  19   1   1   1   1  65  24  27
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A |  0.17  0.93 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -0.47 -0.83 -3.47 
C |  0.72 -1.79 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89 -0.94  1.24  0.75 
G | -1.28 -0.18  1.68  1.68  1.68 -0.81 -2.89  0.64 
T | -0.52 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47  0.71 -0.29 -0.17
Fordyce et. al.
NRG2_CFordyce et. al.P = No dataView matrix ↘
Fisher’s P-valueNo data
Information content9.661
Max PWM score9.61
Recommended cutoff7.21
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.01 0.39 0.80 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.20 0.10 
C | 0.46 0.37 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.65 
G | 0.29 0.06 0.15 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.08 0.01 
T | 0.25 0.17 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.65 0.24
Position count matrix (PCM)
A |   1  39  80   1   1   1  20  10 
C |  46  37   4   1   1   1   7  65 
G |  28   6  15  97  97  97   8   1 
T |  25  17   1   2   1   1  65  24
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -3.47  0.20  0.92 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -0.47 -1.16 
C |  0.94  0.72 -1.50 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89 -0.94  1.28 
G |  0.48 -1.10 -0.18  1.68  1.68  1.68 -0.81 -2.89 
T | -0.25 -0.63 -3.47 -2.77 -3.47 -3.47  0.71 -0.29
Fordyce et. al.
03 / EXPERIMENTAL CONTEXT

Gene-level annotations and interactions.

Genes bound in ChIP-chip experiments 1 genes

No Data

Genes affected by TF deletion 1 genes

No Data

Genes supported by both experiments 1 genes

No Data