S.ScerTFYeast transcription factor database Aaron Spivak
← All factors / TF RECORD

HAL9

YOL089C

View at SGD ↗

Putative transcription factor containing a zinc finger; overexpression increases salt tolerance through increased expression of the ENA1 (Na+/Li+ extrusion pump) gene while gene disruption decreases both salt tolerance and ENA1 expression

01 / RECOMMENDED MATRIX

Best-performing DNA-binding model.

RecommendedSource: Zhu et. al.
Fisher’s P-value0.3036
Information content13.05
Max PWM score15.06
Recommended cutoff9.01
View and copy the recommended matrices ↘
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.13 0.06 0.06 0.01 0.75 
C | 0.06 0.91 0.84 0.03 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.31 0.89 0.09 0.04 0.19 
G | 0.19 0.04 0.09 0.89 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.43 0.03 0.84 0.91 0.06 
T | 0.75 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.13 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.01
Position count matrix (PCM)
A |   1   4   1   1  25  25  25  25  25  25  25  25  25  13   6   6   1  75 
C |   6  91  84   3  25  25  25  25  25  25  25  25  25  31  89   9   4  19 
G |  19   4   9  89  25  25  25  25  25  25  25  25  25  43   3  84  91   6 
T |  75   1   6   6  25  25  25  25  25  25  25  25  25  13   1   1   4   1
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -3.47 -2.08 -3.47 -3.47 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.90 -1.67 -1.67 -3.47  0.85 
C | -1.10  1.62  1.54 -1.79  0.33  0.33  0.33  0.33  0.33  0.33  0.33  0.33  0.33  0.54  1.60 -0.69 -1.50  0.05 
G |  0.05 -1.50 -0.69  1.60  0.33  0.33  0.33  0.33  0.33  0.33  0.33  0.33  0.33  0.87 -1.79  1.54  1.62 -1.10 
T |  0.85 -3.47 -1.67 -1.67 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.25 -0.90 -3.47 -3.47 -2.08 -3.47
02 / COMPARATIVE BENCHMARKS

Alternative candidate matrices 3

Historical matrix candidates from the original ScerTF database. Expand a source to inspect its original logo, scores, and matrix values.

HAL9Badis et. al.P = 0.6667View matrix ↘
Sequence logo for HAL9
Fisher’s P-value0.6667
Information content8.925
Max PWM score6.87
Recommended cutoff6.8
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.97 0.61 
C | 0.97 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 
G | 0.01 0.97 0.97 0.01 0.37 
T | 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Position count matrix (PCM)
A |   1   1   1  97  61 
C |  97   1   1   1   1 
G |   1  97  97   1  37 
T |   1   1   1   1   1
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -3.47 -3.47 -3.47  1.11  0.65 
C |  1.68 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89 
G | -2.89  1.68  1.68 -2.89  0.72 
T | -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47
Badis et. al.
HAL9Foat et. al.P = 0.07592View matrix ↘
Sequence logo for HAL9
Fisher’s P-value0.07592
Information content15.78
Max PWM score13.77
Recommended cutoff8.49
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.56 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.97 0.39 0.01 0.09 
C | 0.01 0.11 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.01 
G | 0.12 0.87 0.01 0.01 0.94 0.97 0.43 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.81 0.01 
T | 0.84 0.01 0.97 0.42 0.02 0.01 0.56 0.97 0.01 0.59 0.08 0.89
Position count matrix (PCM)
A |   3   1   1  56   1   1   1   1  97  39   1   9 
C |   1  11   1   1   2   1   1   1   1   1  10   1 
G |  12  87   1   1  94  97  43   1   1   1  81   1 
T |  84   1  97  42   2   1  56  97   1  59   8  89
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -2.37 -3.47 -3.47  0.56 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47  1.11  0.20 -3.47 -1.27 
C | -2.89 -0.49 -2.89 -2.89 -2.20 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89 -0.59 -2.89 
G | -0.41  1.58 -2.89 -2.89  1.65  1.68  0.87 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89  1.50 -2.89 
T |  0.97 -3.47  1.11  0.27 -2.77 -3.47  0.56  1.11 -3.47  0.61 -1.39  1.02
Foat et. al.
HAL9Zhao and StormoP = 0.2377View matrix ↘
Sequence logo for HAL9
Fisher’s P-value0.2377
Information content6.463
Max PWM score7.01
Recommended cutoff6.41
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.256 0.310 0.031 0.001 0.025 0.522 0.424 0.275 
C | 0.261 0.188 0.888 0.041 0.050 0.179 0.110 0.259 
G | 0.239 0.329 0.029 0.957 0.924 0.210 0.193 0.232 
T | 0.244 0.172 0.052 0.001 0.001 0.089 0.273 0.234
Position count matrix (PCM)
A |  25  31   3   0   2  52  42  27 
C |  26  18  88   4   5  17  11  25 
G |  23  32   2  95  92  21  19  23 
T |  24  17   5   0   0   8  27  23
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -0.22 -0.03 -2.33 -5.77 -2.55  0.49  0.28 -0.15 
C |  0.37  0.04  1.60 -1.48 -1.28 -0.01 -0.49  0.36 
G |  0.28  0.60 -1.83  1.67  1.64  0.15  0.07  0.25 
T | -0.27 -0.62 -1.82 -5.77 -5.77 -1.28 -0.16 -0.31
Zhao and Stormo
03 / EXPERIMENTAL CONTEXT

Gene-level annotations and interactions.

Genes bound in ChIP-chip experiments 80 genes

YCR018C-A, YCR019W, YCR024C, YCR096C, YCR102C, YDL068W, YDL071C, YDR003W, YDR034C-A, YDR042C, YDR078C, YDR079W, YDR084C, YDR086C, YDR098C-A, YDR098C-B, YDR144C, YDR145W, YDR210W-D, YDR434W, YDR495C, YDR520C, YER001W, YER013W, YER044C-A, YER071C, YER072W, YER135C, YGL001C, YGR050C, YGR071C, YGR072W, YGR218W, YGR241C, YGR243W, YGR271W, YGR273C, YGR283C, YHR011W, YHR179W, YIL014W, YJL148W, YJL191W, YJL192C, YJL203W, YJL204C, YJR011C, YJR051W, YKL062W, YKL063C, YLR046C, YLR050C, YLR054C, YLR212C, YLR261C, YLR262C, YLR428C, YLR430W, YLR460C, YMR019W, YMR098C, YMR258C, YMR272C, YNL038W, YNL050C, YNL134C, YNL292W, YNL337W, YOL084W, YOL085C, YOL159C, YOR021C, YOR058C, YPL106C, YPL170W, YPL171C, YPL188W, YPL216W, YPL217C, YPR198W

Genes affected by TF deletion 69 genes

YOR225W, YGL009C, YMR011W, YOR226C, YPL177C, YLR460C, YLL028W, YLL034C, YDR314C, YHR208W, YHR183W, YMR136W, YMR238W, YDR072C, YDR410C, YGL209W, YAL041W, YGL021W, YLR100W, YPL055C, YIL121W, YOR230W, YJR148W, YER001W, YLR101C, YNL220W, YBR102C, YHR089C, YPL008W, YDL198C, YLR128W, YML091C, YMR291W, YFL014W, YLR349W, YMR083W, YDR048C, YDR024W, YDR386W, YKR093W, YMR059W, YBR177C, YKL062W, YOL059W, YJR127C, YKL120W, YDL048C, YDR116C, YJL034W, YMR272C, YLR355C, YNL160W, YOL089C, YOL119C, YPR135W, YER044C, YIL172C, YOR245C, YDR274C, YLR296W, YMR034C, YMR036C, YNL234W, YCR102C, YDR155C, YGR052W, YOL101C, YCL006C, YJR008W

Genes supported by both experiments 5 genes

YCR102C, YER001W, YKL062W, YLR460C, YMR272C