← All factors / TF RECORD

ECM22

YLR228C

View at SGD ↗

Sterol regulatory element binding protein, regulates transcription of sterol biosynthetic genes; contains Zn[2]-Cys[6] binuclear cluster; homologous to Upc2p; relocates from intracellular membranes to perinuclear foci on sterol depletion

01 / RECOMMENDED MATRIX

Best-performing DNA-binding model.

RecommendedSource: Zhu et. al.
Fisher’s P-value0.5252
Information content15.71
Max PWM score15.97
Recommended cutoff7.98
View and copy the recommended matrices ↘
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.06 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.24 0.14 0.23 0.23 0.35 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.92 
C | 0.53 0.78 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.26 0.30 0.08 0.42 0.93 0.04 0.02 0.01 
G | 0.13 0.20 0.94 0.94 0.71 0.16 0.35 0.42 0.11 0.01 0.94 0.95 0.05 
T | 0.29 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.44 0.13 0.27 0.12 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.02 
Position count matrix (PCM)
A |   6   1   1   4  24  14  23  23  35   2   1   2  92 
C |  53  78   3   1   2  26  30   8  42  93   4   2   1 
G |  13  20  94  94  71  16  35  42  11   1  94  95   5 
T |  28   1   1   1   2  44  13  27  12   4   1   1   2 
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -1.67 -3.47 -3.47 -2.08 -0.29 -0.83 -0.33 -0.33  0.09 -2.77 -3.47 -2.77  1.06 
C |  1.08  1.47 -1.79 -2.89 -2.20  0.37  0.51 -0.81  0.85  1.64 -1.50 -2.20 -2.89 
G | -0.33  0.11  1.65  1.65  1.37 -0.12  0.66  0.85 -0.49 -2.89  1.65  1.66 -1.28 
T | -0.10 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -2.77  0.32 -0.90 -0.17 -0.98 -2.08 -3.47 -3.47 -2.77 
02 / COMPARATIVE BENCHMARKS

Alternative candidate matrices 4

Historical matrix candidates from the original ScerTF database. Expand a source to inspect its original logo, scores, and matrix values.

ECM22Badis et. al.P = 0.02047View matrix ↘
Sequence logo for ECM22
Fisher’s P-value0.02047
Information content9.425
Max PWM score8.3
Recommended cutoff4.18
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.14 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.91 
C | 0.07 0.97 0.97 0.14 0.01 0.01 
G | 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.84 0.84 0.07 
T | 0.72 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.01 
Position count matrix (PCM)
A |  14   1   1   1   1  91 
C |   7  97  97  14   1   1 
G |   7   1   1  84  84   7 
T |  72   1   1   1  14   1 
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -0.83 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47  1.05 
C | -0.94  1.68  1.68 -0.25 -2.89 -2.89 
G | -0.94 -2.89 -2.89  1.54  1.54 -0.94 
T |  0.81 -3.47 -3.47 -3.47 -0.83 -3.47 
ECM22Foat et. al.P = 0.8044View matrix ↘
Sequence logo for ECM22
Fisher’s P-value0.8044
Information content12.12
Max PWM score13.43
Recommended cutoff7.43
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.02 0.21 0.67 0.01 0.39 0.01 0.42 0.04 0.15 0.01 0.40 0.01 0.64 0.01 
C | 0.11 0.01 0.12 0.38 0.29 0.01 0.40 0.03 0.71 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.35 
G | 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.01 0.06 0.01 0.01 0.79 0.07 0.29 0.55 0.01 0.03 0.60 
T | 0.86 0.72 0.16 0.61 0.27 0.97 0.18 0.14 0.06 0.70 0.03 0.97 0.33 0.04 
Position count matrix (PCM)
A |   2  21  67   1  39   1  42   4  15   1  40   1  64   1 
C |  11   1  12  38  28   1  40   3  71   1   2   1   1  35 
G |   1   6   5   1   6   1   1  79   7  28  55   1   3  60 
T |  86  72  16  61  27  97  18  14   6  70   3  97  33   4 
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -2.77 -0.42  0.74 -3.47  0.20 -3.47  0.27 -2.08 -0.76 -3.47  0.22 -3.47  0.69 -3.47 
C | -0.49 -2.89 -0.41  0.75  0.48 -2.89  0.80 -1.79  1.37 -2.89 -2.20 -2.89 -2.89  0.66 
G | -2.89 -1.10 -1.28 -2.89 -1.10 -2.89 -2.89  1.48 -0.94  0.48  1.12 -2.89 -1.79  1.20 
T |  0.99  0.81 -0.69  0.65 -0.17  1.11 -0.58 -0.83 -1.67  0.78 -2.37  1.11  0.03 -2.08 
ECM22Macisaac et. alP = 1View matrix ↘
Sequence logo for ECM22
Fisher’s P-value1
Information content19.16
Max PWM score15
Recommended cutoff11.25
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.964 0.012 0.964 0.964 0.012 0.012 
C | 0.964 0.012 0.964 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.964 
G | 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.964 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.964 0.012 
T | 0.012 0.964 0.012 0.012 0.964 0.012 0.964 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012 
Position count matrix (PCM)
A |   1   1   1   1   1  96   1  96  96   1   1 
C |  96   1  96   1   1   1   1   1   1   1  96 
G |   1   1   1  96   1   1   1   1   1  96   1 
T |   1  96   1   1  96   1  96   1   1   1   1 
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -3.28 -3.28 -3.28 -3.28 -3.28  1.10 -3.28  1.10  1.10 -3.28 -3.28 
C |  1.68 -2.71  1.68 -2.71 -2.71 -2.71 -2.71 -2.71 -2.71 -2.71  1.68 
G | -2.71 -2.71 -2.71  1.68 -2.71 -2.71 -2.71 -2.71 -2.71  1.68 -2.71 
T | -3.28  1.10 -3.28 -3.28  1.10 -3.28  1.10 -3.28 -3.28 -3.28 -3.28 
ECM22Zhao and StormoP = 0.005716View matrix ↘
Sequence logo for ECM22
Fisher’s P-value0.005716
Information content5.939
Max PWM score7.04
Recommended cutoff3.96
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.181 0.089 0.001 0.001 0.062 0.289 0.292 0.241 
C | 0.316 0.260 0.870 0.997 0.098 0.194 0.216 0.267 
G | 0.174 0.166 0.001 0.001 0.741 0.326 0.262 0.251 
T | 0.329 0.484 0.128 0.001 0.098 0.190 0.230 0.241 
Position count matrix (PCM)
A |  18   8   0   0   6  28  29  24 
C |  31  26  87  99   9  19  21  26 
G |  17  16   0   0  74  32  26  25 
T |  32  48  12   0   9  19  23  24 
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -0.57 -1.28 -5.77 -5.77 -1.64 -0.10 -0.09 -0.28 
C |  0.56  0.37  1.58  1.71 -0.61  0.07  0.18  0.39 
G | -0.03 -0.08 -5.19 -5.19  1.42  0.59  0.38  0.33 
T |  0.03  0.41 -0.92 -5.77 -1.18 -0.52 -0.33 -0.28 
03 / EXPERIMENTAL CONTEXT

Gene-level annotations and interactions.

Genes bound in ChIP-chip experiments 6 genes

YAL008W, YBR260C, YBR261C, YBR263W, YFR050C, YPL185W

Genes affected by TF deletion 69 genes

YDR432W, YDR188W, YLR056W, YIL111W, YKR038C, YNL017C, YGL012W, YDR098C, YIR030C, YNL143C, YMR314W, YLL059C, YMR072W, YLR100W, YOL053W, YJR101W, YEL023C, YKL055C, YLR101C, YMR227C, YOR072W, YPR148C, YLR164W, YIR037W, YBR296C, YJL222W, YIL096C, YLR228C, YMR030W, YFR048W, YNL094W, YPL063W, YMR272C, YMR146C, YMR119W-A, YOL153C, YER044C, YER100W, YLR165C, YMR325W, YER091C, YBR024W, YCR006C, YIL172C, YMR033W, YAR047C, YBR185C, YGL255W, YAL026C, YAL058C-A, YAR031W, YAL059W, YBR178W, YDL087C, YDR267C, YDR213W, YML014W, YDR182W, YGR085C, YHR046C, YHR107C, YMR154C, YNL203C, YOL132W, YBR151W, YBR089W, YDR121W, YGR024C, YGR267C