S.ScerTFYeast transcription factor database Aaron Spivak
← All factors / TF RECORD

DAL80

YKR034W, UGA43

View at SGD ↗

Negative regulator of genes in multiple nitrogen degradation pathways; expression is regulated by nitrogen levels and by Gln3p; member of the GATA-binding family, forms homodimers and heterodimers with Deh1p

01 / RECOMMENDED MATRIX

Best-performing DNA-binding model.

RecommendedSource: Harbison et. al.
Fisher’s P-value0.03474
Information content7.706
Max PWM score6.08
Recommended cutoff6.08
View and copy the recommended matrices ↘
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.012 0.964 0.012 0.964 0.964 
C | 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012 
G | 0.965 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012 
T | 0.012 0.012 0.964 0.012 0.012
Position count matrix (PCM)
A |   1  96   1  96  96 
C |   1   1   1   1   1 
G |  96   1   1   1   1 
T |   1   1  96   1   1
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -3.28  1.10 -3.28  1.10  1.10 
C | -2.71 -2.71 -2.71 -2.71 -2.71 
G |  1.68 -2.71 -2.71 -2.71 -2.71 
T | -3.28 -3.28  1.10 -3.28 -3.28
02 / COMPARATIVE BENCHMARKS

Alternative candidate matrices 9

Historical matrix candidates from the original ScerTF database. Expand a source to inspect its original logo, scores, and matrix values.

DAL80Badis et. al.P = 0.01073View matrix ↘
Sequence logo for DAL80
Fisher’s P-value0.01073
Information content9.778
Max PWM score8.79
Recommended cutoff6.22
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.11 0.01 0.97 0.01 0.97 0.91 0.03 
C | 0.66 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.19 
G | 0.06 0.97 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.75 
T | 0.17 0.01 0.01 0.97 0.01 0.07 0.03
Position count matrix (PCM)
A |  11   1  97   1  97  91   3 
C |  66   1   1   1   1   1  19 
G |   6  97   1   1   1   1  75 
T |  17   1   1  97   1   7   3
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -1.07 -3.47  1.11 -3.47  1.11  1.05 -2.37 
C |  1.30 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89  0.05 
G | -1.10  1.68 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89  1.43 
T | -0.63 -3.47 -3.47  1.11 -3.47 -1.52 -2.37
Badis et. al.
DAL80_AFoat et. al.P = 1View matrix ↘
Sequence logo for DAL80_A
Fisher’s P-value1
Information content17.53
Max PWM score18.12
Recommended cutoff13.59
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.95 0.05 0.18 0.01 0.97 0.02 0.20 0.51 0.02 0.34 0.07 0.87 0.01 0.01 0.97 0.44 0.01 
C | 0.01 0.12 0.23 0.30 0.01 0.01 0.59 0.02 0.11 0.28 0.82 0.11 0.25 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 
G | 0.03 0.32 0.42 0.01 0.01 0.97 0.05 0.16 0.82 0.25 0.01 0.01 0.68 0.68 0.01 0.52 0.05 
T | 0.01 0.51 0.17 0.69 0.01 0.01 0.17 0.32 0.04 0.13 0.11 0.01 0.06 0.31 0.01 0.03 0.93
Position count matrix (PCM)
A |  95   5  18   1  97   2  20  51   2  34   7  87   1   1  97  44   1 
C |   1  12  23  30   1   1  59   2  11  28  82  11  25   1   1   1   1 
G |   3  32  42   1   1  97   5  16  82  25   1   1  68  68   1  52   5 
T |   1  51  17  69   1   1  17  32   4  13  11   1   6  31   1   3  93
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A |  1.09 -1.86 -0.58 -3.47  1.11 -2.77 -0.47  0.47 -2.77  0.06 -1.52  1.00 -3.47 -3.47  1.11  0.32 -3.47 
C | -2.89 -0.41  0.25  0.51 -2.89 -2.89  1.19 -2.20 -0.49  0.44  1.52 -0.49  0.33 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89 
G | -1.79  0.58  0.85 -2.89 -2.89  1.68 -1.28 -0.12  1.52  0.33 -2.89 -2.89  1.33  1.33 -2.89  1.06 -1.28 
T | -3.47  0.47 -0.63  0.77 -3.47 -3.47 -0.63  0.00 -2.08 -0.90 -1.07 -3.47 -1.67 -0.03 -3.47 -2.37  1.07
Foat et. al.
DAL80_BFoat et. al.P = 1View matrix ↘
Sequence logo for DAL80_B
Fisher’s P-value1
Information content16.98
Max PWM score16.76
Recommended cutoff12.57
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.01 0.23 0.01 0.80 0.04 0.01 0.97 0.21 0.04 0.01 0.95 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.56 
C | 0.13 0.39 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.57 0.92 0.83 0.01 0.01 0.78 0.30 0.15 
G | 0.63 0.28 0.19 0.18 0.01 0.97 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.20 0.18 0.11 
T | 0.23 0.10 0.79 0.01 0.94 0.01 0.01 0.20 0.03 0.16 0.01 0.97 0.01 0.45 0.17
Position count matrix (PCM)
A |   1  23   1  80   4   1  97  21   4   1  95   1   1   7  56 
C |  13  39   1   1   1   1   1  56  92  83   1   1  78  30  15 
G |  63  28  19  18   1  97   1   1   1   1   3   1  20  18  11 
T |  23  10  79   1  94   1   1  20   3  16   1  97   1  45  17
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -3.47 -0.33 -3.47  0.92 -2.08 -3.47  1.11 -0.42 -2.08 -3.47  1.09 -3.47 -3.47 -1.52  0.56 
C | -0.33  0.77 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89  1.15  1.63  1.53 -2.89 -2.89  1.47  0.51 -0.18 
G |  1.25  0.44  0.05  0.00 -2.89  1.68 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89 -1.79 -2.89  0.11  0.00 -0.49 
T | -0.33 -1.16  0.90 -3.47  1.08 -3.47 -3.47 -0.47 -2.37 -0.69 -3.47  1.11 -3.47  0.34 -0.63
Foat et. al.
DAL80_AFordyce et. al.P = 0.171View matrix ↘
Fisher’s P-value0.171
Information content7.08
Max PWM score7.76
Recommended cutoff6.58
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.13 0.19 0.31 0.01 0.97 0.01 0.77 0.31 
C | 0.51 0.34 0.54 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.10 
G | 0.24 0.29 0.06 0.97 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.22 
T | 0.12 0.19 0.09 0.01 0.01 0.97 0.16 0.37
Position count matrix (PCM)
A |  13  19  31   1  97   1  77  31 
C |  51  34  54   1   1   1   4  10 
G |  24  28   6  97   1   1   3  22 
T |  12  19   9   1   1  97  16  37
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -0.90 -0.52 -0.03 -3.47  1.11 -3.47  0.88 -0.03 
C |  1.04  0.64  1.10 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89 -1.50 -0.59 
G |  0.29  0.48 -1.10  1.68 -2.89 -2.89 -1.79  0.20 
T | -0.98 -0.52 -1.27 -3.47 -3.47  1.11 -0.69  0.15
Fordyce et. al.
DAL80_BFordyce et. al.P = 0.0665View matrix ↘
Fisher’s P-value0.0665
Information content7.116
Max PWM score7.83
Recommended cutoff5.14
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.21 0.06 0.38 0.12 0.95 0.03 0.01 0.09 
C | 0.28 0.47 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.94 0.10 
G | 0.31 0.37 0.10 0.06 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.63 
T | 0.20 0.10 0.45 0.81 0.01 0.93 0.01 0.18
Position count matrix (PCM)
A |  21   6  38  12  95   3   1   9 
C |  28  47   7   1   1   1  94  10 
G |  31  37  10   6   3   3   5  63 
T |  20  10  45  81   1  93   1  18
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -0.42 -1.67  0.17 -0.98  1.09 -2.37 -3.47 -1.27 
C |  0.44  0.96 -0.94 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89  1.65 -0.59 
G |  0.54  0.72 -0.59 -1.10 -1.79 -1.79 -1.28  1.25 
T | -0.47 -1.16  0.34  0.93 -3.47  1.07 -3.47 -0.58
Fordyce et. al.
DAL80_CFordyce et. al.P = 0.06557View matrix ↘
Fisher’s P-value0.06557
Information content7.082
Max PWM score7.86
Recommended cutoff4.88
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.06 0.37 0.12 0.95 0.03 0.02 0.09 0.17 
C | 0.48 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.94 0.11 0.29 
G | 0.35 0.12 0.07 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.62 0.32 
T | 0.10 0.44 0.80 0.01 0.94 0.01 0.18 0.22
Position count matrix (PCM)
A |   6  37  12  95   3   2   9  17 
C |  48   7   1   1   1  94  11  28 
G |  35  12   7   3   2   3  62  32 
T |  10  44  80   1  94   1  18  22
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -1.67  0.15 -0.98  1.09 -2.37 -2.77 -1.27 -0.63 
C |  0.98 -0.94 -2.89 -2.89 -2.89  1.65 -0.49  0.48 
G |  0.66 -0.41 -0.94 -1.79 -2.20 -1.79  1.24  0.58 
T | -1.16  0.32  0.92 -3.47  1.08 -3.47 -0.58 -0.37
Fordyce et. al.
DAL80Macisaac et. alP = 0.03474View matrix ↘
Sequence logo for DAL80
Fisher’s P-value0.03474
Information content7.706
Max PWM score6.08
Recommended cutoff6.08
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.012 0.964 0.012 0.964 0.964 
C | 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012 
G | 0.964 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012 
T | 0.012 0.012 0.964 0.012 0.012
Position count matrix (PCM)
A |   1  96   1  96  96 
C |   1   1   1   1   1 
G |  96   1   1   1   1 
T |   1   1  96   1   1
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -3.28  1.10 -3.28  1.10  1.10 
C | -2.71 -2.71 -2.71 -2.71 -2.71 
G |  1.68 -2.71 -2.71 -2.71 -2.71 
T | -3.28 -3.28  1.10 -3.28 -3.28
Macisaac et. al
DAL80Morozov et. al.P = 0.008102View matrix ↘
Sequence logo for DAL80
Fisher’s P-value0.008102
Information content3.309
Max PWM score5.27
Recommended cutoff3.92
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.110 0.050 0.725 0.145 0.350 0.050 
C | 0.565 0.115 0.115 0.240 0.330 0.390 
G | 0.145 0.720 0.110 0.110 0.240 0.420 
T | 0.180 0.115 0.050 0.505 0.080 0.140
Position count matrix (PCM)
A |  11   5  72  14  35   5 
C |  56  11  11  24  33  39 
G |  14  72  11  11  24  42 
T |  18  11   5  50   8  14
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -1.07 -1.86  0.82 -0.79  0.09 -1.86 
C |  1.14 -0.45 -0.45  0.29  0.61  0.77 
G | -0.22  1.39 -0.49 -0.49  0.29  0.85 
T | -0.58 -1.02 -1.86  0.46 -1.39 -0.83
Morozov et. al.
DAL80Pachkov et alP = 0.02089View matrix ↘
Sequence logo for DAL80
Fisher’s P-value0.02089
Information content10.44
Max PWM score7.74
Recommended cutoff7.74
Position frequency matrix (PFM)
A | 0.001 0.001 0.178 1.000 0.001 0.042 
C | 1.000 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.958 
G | 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 
T | 0.001 1.000 0.822 0.001 1.000 0.001
Position count matrix (PCM)
A |   0   0  17 100   0   4 
C | 100   0   0   0   0  95 
G |   0   0   0   0   0   0 
T |   0 100  82   0 100   0
Position weight matrix (PWM)
A | -5.77 -5.77 -0.59  1.14 -5.77 -2.03 
C |  1.71 -5.19 -5.19 -5.19 -5.19  1.67 
G | -5.19 -5.19 -5.19 -5.19 -5.19 -5.19 
T | -5.77  1.14  0.94 -5.77  1.14 -5.77
Pachkov et al
03 / EXPERIMENTAL CONTEXT

Gene-level annotations and interactions.

Genes bound in ChIP-chip experiments 63 genes

YAL025C, YBL018C, YBL050W, YBL051C, YBR041W, YBR102C, YBR103W, YCR083W, YDL049C, YDL089W, YDL090C, YDL233W, YDL234C, YDR042C, YDR113C, YDR115W, YDR127W, YDR473C, YER085C, YER086W, YGR222W, YHL042W, YHR074W, YHR182W, YIL048W, YIL085C, YIL086C, YIL087C, YIL150C, YJL157C, YJL205C-A, YJR051W, YKL070W, YKR017C, YLL011W, YLR172C, YLR173W, YLR242C, YLR243W, YLR272C, YLR273C, YLR274W, YLR363C, YLR364W, YMR178W, YNL131W, YNL188W, YNL256W, YNL257C, YNL258C, YOL023W, YOL042W, YOL043C, YOL055C, YOR093C, YOR094W, YOR151C, YOR174W, YOR209C, YOR210W, YOR280C, YOR282W, YPL020C

Genes affected by TF deletion 35 genes

YDR398W, YHR146W, YPL016W, YOL110W, YBR093C, YDR281C, YGL072C, YLR183C, YMR023C, YBR166C, YLR099C, YHR031C, YLR316C, YHR215W, YLR312C, YAR071W, YIL059C, YCR024C-A, YMR026C, YNL099C, YOR209C, YOR017W, YPL001W, YPL066W, YOR333C, YDR322W, YNL318C, YHR136C, YBR182C, YHR135C, YJL142C, YCR099C, YJL047C, YJR013W, YOR124C

Genes supported by both experiments 1 genes

YOR209C

Predicted TF–TF partners 3 genes

GAT1, GLN3, GZF3

Explore 3 original interaction plots →